![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
lynn82md.livejournal.comTwo ethicists working with Australian universities argue in the latest online edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics that if abortion of a fetus is allowable, so to should be the termination of a newborn.
First of all, I want to vocally say that as a pro-choicer I DO NOT support what these two people in the article are advocating for. I do think that many pro-choicers would agree with me on this for a few reasons.
( More )
Personally, I don't believe in killing a born entity unless it's for survival purposes (i.e self-defense, for food-with animals). I mean, the biggest reason why I had been pro-life originally was because I mixed up abortion with infantside since I thought it was killing a baby (a newborn). So, of course I'm not going to support that even as a pro-choicer. Sorry to these Ethicists. IMO, you are advocating infantside and I don't support choices like that.
First of all, I want to vocally say that as a pro-choicer I DO NOT support what these two people in the article are advocating for. I do think that many pro-choicers would agree with me on this for a few reasons.
( More )
Personally, I don't believe in killing a born entity unless it's for survival purposes (i.e self-defense, for food-with animals). I mean, the biggest reason why I had been pro-life originally was because I mixed up abortion with infantside since I thought it was killing a baby (a newborn). So, of course I'm not going to support that even as a pro-choicer. Sorry to these Ethicists. IMO, you are advocating infantside and I don't support choices like that.
Tags:
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}